Curiosity is a curious thing.
It, curiosity, is an entity – a drive, a phenomenon, an instinct, a pushing pull – that provides for an essential ingredient to the human genome, to the relatively sentient organism, and its survival in this chaotic, random world. Without curiosity, we’d not have evolved in the way we did, in a way seeing us develop this enigmatic edifice of a civilisation, with all its gadgets and gizmos, toys and governmental ploys.
Without giving into our temptations to be curious, and to question not only authority, but also nature and our perception of nature itself, we’d have stagnated in our cognitive process as a species. And hell, as oxymoronic as this is, we’d never have developed the mental aptitude to consider why curiosity can sometimes lead us astray – for instance, when our naturalistic curiosity to touch, and feel and jump into resplendent objects, otherwise known as fire. Ironically, the phrase curiosity never killed the cat is indeed an expression borne out of curiosity.
It is true that curiosity alone can be very dangerous. It is equally true that intelligence without curiosity is kinda pointless. Curiosity, however, impregnated with the imaginative genius that is the human mind, is a recipe for magic. And wanna know something neat? You, yeah you, person reading this are an imaginative genius.
Why then, do we persist with these silly little phrases? Why then, is our civilised society so set on ridding curiosity from its system?
Oh, what’s that you say?
Hobble gosh! Society isn’t set on ridding curiosity from its system. That’s preposterous, paranoid, phony-propaganda. It’s crazy talk. You crazy.
Well, to that I say: Each to their own opinion. But here’s mine.
If you look at our schooling system, a system designed to pave the way for the future’s arrival, it doesn’t at all, AT ALL, encourage creative thought. And yes, I’m speaking for every single school, from every single pocket of the world, indeed.
Really though, and I know that this is general, but our education systems nurture memorisation, comprehension and application much more than they do innovation, interpretation or creative illustration. And it’s always been like this. Whacky thinkers, especially prophets and authentic contrarians, were often hung, burnt at the stake, crucified (literally), beheaded, or just plain extradited from their home lands for submitting to their curiosity, and having ideas not yet plopped into the collective’s consciousness – talk about extreme resistance, hey? And no, this sort of stuff isn’t so ancient, either. We’re talking centuries, folks, less than centuries in some cases; names like Kafka and Tolstoy and Wilde come to mind. Hell, this shit still happens today.
People whose views or behaviours are totally divergent from the norm are still ostracised, ridiculed and condemned accordingly. The only difference now is that weirdo’s can unite through the cyber web, and so the views of minorities are usually accepted by at least a few others; but aside from this point, we still, today, pick on and think ill of those with an exceedingly curious eye.
And here you say, that’s equating curiosity to divergence or contrariety, and that’s wrong.
Well, my question would be: Is it?
Because ultimately, isn’t that why the expression “curiosity killed the cat” survived so enduringly?
No, not at all! Still wrong. You’re stupid. Stupid.
Well, maybe. But if you think about it, it kind of makes sense.
Curiosity killed the relationship when Bob asked Sandra if she was ‘cheating’ on him. ‘Cause she was. They could have been living in a happy ball of ignorant bliss had Bob not pushed the matter. Isn’t that demarcating a fear of change?
Little Timmy asked his teacher what happens when two black holes collide, to which she replied, “Timmy! Don’t ask such questions, they are irrelevant and won’t help you with the test.” Leaving Jimmy feeling stupid and isolated for his rather outlandish thoughts. Slowly but surely squeezing all the curious juice right outta ‘im. Slowly but surely melting the inner contrarian outta ‘im, leaving only a sheeple behind.
We’re scared of ideas and conceptions that we’ve not yet been introduced to (neuro-scientifically tested, actually!) and so we shy away from our own inner curious-weirdo, and that of others so to avoid these alien thoughts and feelings from burgeoning. Like it or not, society – as an abstracted, intangible entity that permeates through our invisible spheres – doesn’t like encouraging thinking outside the box; and, when it does so, the box is confined to means through which a specific purpose or desire can be met and fulfilled.
Well, I for one say, fuck the box, I’m a think outside the circle. Or, fuck geometric shapes all together; I’m a think outside the crocodile’s jaw line.
For the kids reading this, and equally so for the adults with still the flame that is their inner child burning inside, it’s all lies. Curiosity never killed the cat. Father Christmas isn’t real and neither is that expression (aside, of course, from its reality as an expression).
Sorry to break it to you (no I’m not), but sometimes the truth hurts (just like curiosity sometimes can, but it’s worth it in the end, I promise. No I don’t).
Humans-are-curious-creatures. And so they should be.



you always seem to what I am thinking into words at the exact appropriate moment!
I shared a quote from this post on my blog, hope that ok? I credited and linked to you!
I’m quite convinced that crazy people see a relatively similar world, so that’s probably no surprise. And would I mind? Of course I’d mind. Sharing my quotes on your blog is a terrible, terrible thing. Haha. Ergh. Butterflies.
So, true. All crazy people think alike.. must be why I just know certain friends “understand the darkness”, the thought process behind certain ideas… and others don’t.
Well maybe curiosity is discouraged because humans are herd animals and the curious who wonder far from the herd are in danger of drawing predators to themselves and\or the herd.
Or perhaps it’s because basic education was created not for the betterment of the individual, but to make a better pool from which to draw the workforce.
You are right. Curiosity with creativity, is discouraged in education and in fact, even punished. But hey, I like it.
I’m not so sure how discouraging curiosity would help in that way in a modern world with 7 billion people? And very right with the work force, though I’d switch it around and say to make a better workforce from a more dulled down pool. Not sure if you meant you like punishing and discouraging curiosity, or curiosity from that last bit. Either way, whats you likes, you likes.
I was just curious… how many strangers have you kissed so far?
How well can you ever know someone? (loop hole: can kiss anyone and they count as a stranger).
Yes; of course!
Have you read Alastair Reid’s poem. “Curiosity”? “Curiosity may have killed the cat. More likely the cat was just unlucky or curious to see what death was was like, having no cause
to go on licking paws, or fathering
litter on litter of kittens, predictably.
Nevertheless, to be curious
is dangerous enough. To distrust
what is always said, what seems
to ask odd questions, interfere in dreams,
leave home, smell rats, have hunches
do not endear cats to those doggy circles
where well-smelt baskets, suitable wives, good lunches
are the order of things, and where prevails
much wagging of incurious heads and tails.
Face it. Curiosity
will not cause us to die–
only lack of it will.
Never to want to see
the other side of the hill
or that improbable country
where living is an idyll
(although a probable hell)
would kill us all.
Only the curious
have, if they live, a tale
worth telling at all.
Dogs say cats love too much, are irresponsible,
are changeable, marry too many wives,
desert their children, chill all dinner tables
with tales of their nine lives.
Well, they are lucky. Let them be
nine-lived and contradictory,
curious enough to change, prepared to pay
the cat price, which is to die
and die again and again,
each time with no less pain.
A cat minority of one
is all that can be counted on
to tell the truth. And what cats have to tell
on each return from hell
is this: that dying is what the living do,
that dying is what the loving do,
and that dead dogs are those who do not know
that dying is what, to live, each has to do.” Inspiring concept , really I’m more of a “cat dog”, like a Cavalier King Charles Spaniel, with the heart of a dog, curiosity of a cat, but within limits. Lol
Hi! There are many phrases which are clearly nonsense such as “You have to be cruel to be kind”. It’s worth noting that, in my experience, it’s only stupid people who seriously say this… the sort of people who repeat trivia such as “95% of communication is non-verbal.” Where did this factoid come from? How is it still taken seriously when it’s at best obviously misleading? It’s because people like nonsense trivia, particularly the statistic, to help them lend weight to a point they make. I guess it’s similar with clichés/platitudes, they help people who don’t like thinking avoid thinking…and pass on the non-thinking meme to others.
Great post by the way!